2005 Norms for Evaluation in the UN System (updated 2016 Norms and Standards are available). PDF Norms and Standards for Evaluation - International Organization for competencies for evaluators, and take the final decision on selection of staff; After consultation with UNDP management, present to the Executive Board a multi-year requirements, that evaluations meet the appropriate UNEG norms and standards, that evaluations are managed efficiently and that findings are communicated clearly in a manner appropriate for the audience. It was part of the UN consultative group on programme questions (CCPOQ). the UNDP decentralized evaluation function, and national evaluation capacity programming. In addition to learning, evaluations help hold UNDP and its associated programmes and funds PDF Measurement instruments for assessing the performance of - ed the norms and standards of the United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG). Assist the Country Office to monitor and report on the implementation of agreed management response actions. However, the last decade has witnessed many changes in global, regional and national contexts and in the practice of evaluation. Executive Board, taking into account the advice of the Audit and Evaluation Advisory Committee. United Nations Development Programme - Evaluation Similarly, pay attention to evaluation knowledge networks to identify innovations and lessons learned that may be relevant for the CO and partners to improve their evaluation function. national evaluation capacity is embraced as a programmatic priority in its own right, in line with independence, as well as the impartiality and credibility of its work; and who reports directly to Developing country work experience and/or familiarity with emergency is considered an asset. With respect to evaluation, the Committee will review and advise the Administrator on: appointment and dismissal of the Director of the Independent Evaluation Office; multi-year and annual work plans, budget, and periodic reports of the Independent Evaluation independent evaluations conducted by the Independent Evaluation Office of UNDP; the decentralized should be consistent with ambition. UNEG Evaluation Use in the UN System: Conclusions from the Data [2016] agreement or partnership protocol (such as the Global Environment Facility), evaluations are Preamble The United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG), as a group of professional practitioners, undertook to define norms and standards that aim at contributing to the professionalization of. environments in which they work, and evaluations must be conducted legally. These revisions reflect the substantial consensus that evaluatio Tag: UNEG Core Competencies for Evaluators UNEG Foundation Documents, Norms and Standards for Evaluation (2016). All evaluations should drive The scope, design and implementation of an evaluation UNICEF strongly encourages the use of flexible working arrangements. It was developed using the OECD-DAC criteria of relevance, coherence, efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability, and weighs the performance . The term of appointment of the Director is limited to a single, five-year term, non-renewable and The Audit and Evaluation Advisory Committee will oversee the commissioning of an independent and external review of the UNDP evaluation function every four years, with the next review to take place in 2023. provides legitimacy to evaluation and reduces the potential for conflicts of interest. Tag: Internal Documents Professionalisation UNEG Foundation Documents, UNEG Principles of Working Together (2019). Ensure that the Country Office is effectively linked to wider UNICEF capacity building developments in a way that both contributes to and benefits from organizational learning. Board, in consultation with UNDP management; Manage the Office and its budget in a fiscally responsible manner, including contributions These organizations establish Read how the Evaluation Office turns policy into practice. All evaluations carried out by the Independent Evaluation Office are informed by its Evaluation Charter. Without compromising their independence, and in order to promote an evaluation culture based on knowledge-sharing, evaluation managers should include key users throughout each stage of the evaluation process. It is a group of heads of UN evaluation offices which meet to discuss system wide evaluation issues. Evaluations sometimes uncover evidence of wrongdoing. PDF Standards for Evaluation in the UN System - United Nations Office on The status of implementation of this policy is reported by the Independent Evaluation Office to the PDF UNICEF-Adapted UNEG Evaluation Reports Standards UNEG Programme of Work 2022 Jun 2022 The UNEG Work Plan 2022 has been developed around our three Strategic Objectives: SO1: Develop and safeguard professional norms, standards and guidance SO2: Enhance professionalization and capacity SO3: Influence. Appointments are also subject to inoculation (vaccination) requirements, including against SARS-CoV-2 (Covid). Background checks will include the verification of academic credential(s) and employment history. Capacity-building initiatives include guidance, training, and the enhanced use of best These norms and standards from the United Nations Evaluation Group serve as a key reference for evaluators around the globe. Independent Evaluation Office regional evaluation advisers work with senior managers accountable for development results in the regions. To ensure that information generated is accurate and reliable, data collection, analysis and dissemination for all evaluations should meet the quality standards defined by UNEG and set out in UNDP guidance. Support country-led evaluations of policies and programmes and the consideration of the results by partners. In August 2014, UNEG produced "Intergrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluations". following elements: Independent evaluation. processes, with due consultation and recognition of the right to respond by the evaluated party. UNEG_Norms_2005-FINAL.pdf (500 KB / English). Because change occurs simultaneously at multiple levels (the individual teacher/principal level, the PLC team level, and the school or district level), the logic model also organizes key variables by level. Document Library Evaluators must respect the right of institutions and individuals to provide information in In carrying out their evaluation functions, UNDP, UNCDF and UNV adhere to the interrelated All decentralized evaluations commissioned by UNDP programme and project units are designed and implemented in accordance with the UNDP evaluation guidelines. To help them fulfill their potential. frameworks, which establish the logical sequence of planned results and include a theory of change The UNEG Principles of Working Together (PWT) define the principles by which UNEG functions in terms of membership, governance, ways of working and funding. The UNEG Ethical Guidelines for Evaluation were first published in 2008. contributing to development results at different levels. Explore and easily find UNSDG publications. The policy seeks to increase transparency, coherence and efficiency in generating and using evaluative knowledge for organizational learning and effective management for results, and to support accountability. bureaux and country offices), on the other. All rights reserved. The Independent Evaluation Office abides by the Evaluation Policy of UNDP. The Independent Evaluation Office manages a quality assessment system for decentralized evaluations, providing feedback on performance to UNDP bureaux and country offices, and reporting annually to the Executive Board. The OECD-DAC Network on Development Evaluation (EvalNet) and the UN Evaluation Group (UNEG) maintain a Joint Task Force to support professional Peer Reviews of the evaluation function of UN organizations. The United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) is a platform for the different United Nations (UN) evaluation offices to discuss evaluation issues and to share evaluation knowledge. Support the conceptualization of programme reviews (where applicable) from an evaluation perspective. Job no: 563413 Detail of Norms and Standards for Evaluation (2016) Evaluation resource centre | UNICEF Evaluation in UNICEF The UNEG norms seek to facilitate system-wide collaboration on evaluation by ensuring that evaluation entities within the United Nations follow agreed-upon basic principles. United Nations Development Programme - Evaluation- Rating System These procedures establish minimum standards for UNICEF evaluations and ensure ethical oversight and accountability. UNSDG | Standards for Evaluation in the UN System Pleasesee the updated document at http://www.unevaluation.org/2016-Norms-and-Standards. evaluations that can feed into development programming at global, regional and country While they are mutually supportive, there is a distinct difference between the evaluation and 220 East 42nd Street, Room 2036 Quality Checklist for Evaluation Terms of Reference, Resolution Strengthening Voluntary National Reviewsthrough Country-led Evaluation, Disability-Inclusive Evaluations in UNICEF: Guideline for Achieving UNDIS Standards, Guidance and Procedural Note on Managing Real-Time Evaluations Plus (RTE Plus), Procedureon the Implementation of the UNICEF Evaluation Policy, UNICEF Corporate Implementation Framework, Evaluation Management Response: Guidance for UNICEF Staff, Management Response Standard Operating Procedures, Procedure for Ethical Standards in Research, Evaluation, Data Collection and Analysis, Guidance Note: Adolescent participationin UNICEF monitoringand evaluation, Guidance Note for Conducting Evaluability Assessments in UNICEF, Guidance on Gender Integration in Evaluation, Quadrennial comprehensive policy review of operational activities for development of the UN system, Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluation, UNEG Evaluation Use in the UN System: Conclusions from the Data, Capacity building for the evaluation of development activities at the country level, UNEG Code of Conduct for Evaluation in the UN System, UNEG Peer Review of the Evaluation Function of UNICEF, Professional Peer Review of the Evaluation Function of UNICEF, Peer Review of the Evaluation Function of UNICEF, Introducing evaluation of humanitarian action, e-Courses programme in Development Evaluation. These procedures outline key accountabilities in preparing and implementing management responses for evaluations. This evaluation policy sets out the purpose and basic principles of evaluation, and defines the and decentralized evaluation strategies and methods. UNCDF and UNV have established evaluation units that commission decentralized evaluations in ways Each annual Pleasesee the updated document at http://www.unevaluation.org/2016-Norms-and-Standards. The policy covers the evaluations. Evaluations that there is structural freedom over the conduct of evaluations. 1 UN Plaza 20th Floor New York, NY 10017 Experience in related evidence functions is an asset, including Quantitative and Qualitative Data Analysis, Research, Programme Audit, and Programme Planning and Monitoring. The appointment of the Director is the responsibility of the Administrator, in consultation with the Selection will be based on professional evaluation expertise and competence, as defined in policies and procedures, after consultation with the Executive Board through its Bureau. during the previous year and programme of work for the current and following year; Decentralized evaluations. considers its implementation, and periodically commissions independent reviews of the policy. compliance with best international evaluation and data collection standards, including the PDF UNEG Standards for Evaluation in the UN System General Assembly resolutions 64/289 and 62/208 and the UNEG norms and standards Endorse the present document as the policy statement on the evaluation function of UN-Women Acknowledge with appreciation the steps taken by UN-Women to ensure an independent, credible and useful evaluation function Together with the Office, the Bureau provides guidance to UNDP units on the use of evaluation findings and lessons to improve organizational decision-making and accountability, and synthesizes evaluation lessons for institutional learning.